If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC might dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only finished When the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. While in the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded to your allegations therefore they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use being seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution is usually justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears along with a new system is put in its place.
Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) from the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Ordinarily, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which include People in distinct violation of established case regulation) for the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, and the case is not really appealed, the decision will stand.
Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to these types of past decisions, drawing on proven judicial authority to formulate their positions.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load supplied to any reported judgment may depend upon the reputation of both the reporter as well as judges.[7]
Amir Abdul Majid, 2021 SCMR 420. twelve. There isn't any denial from the fact that in Government service it is expected that the persons having their character above board, free from any moral stigma, are to generally be inducted. Verification of character and antecedents is often a condition precedent for appointment into a Government service. The candidates must have good character and provide two recent character certificates from unrelated individuals. What is discernible from the above is that the only impediment to being appointed to a Government service would be the conviction on an offense involving moral turpitude but involvement, which does not culminate into a proof by conviction, cannot be a means out or guise to perform absent with the candidature of the petitioner. Read more
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf from the boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf on the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for a dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all performing in their jobs with DCFS.
Article 27 on the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination on the time of appointment of service but after the appointment in addition. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers while in the District Judiciary is during the clear negation in the law laid down with the Supreme Court in its various pronouncements. Read more
The Cornell Law School website offers various information on legal topics, together with citation of case law, and also offers a video tutorial on case citation.
Summaries of cases that shape the lives of younger individuals, making sure a deeper understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and fanatics alike.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked read more to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, Additionally it is a very well-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.